Friday, December 28, 2012
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Monday, December 17, 2012
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Friday, December 14, 2012
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Monday, December 10, 2012
Friday, December 7, 2012
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Friday, November 30, 2012
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Monday, November 26, 2012
Saturday, November 24, 2012
Friday, November 23, 2012
Thursday, November 22, 2012
Monday, November 19, 2012
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Sunday, November 4, 2012
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
Sunday, October 28, 2012
More bull
Why would any rational person think that God has input at all in that anthology? Again, mere miserable misanthropes just made it up! Why would their account be any better than say that of Zoroaster? Inclusivists claim that all religions partake of the divine. But as Theodore Drange notes, were there God,He's have one coherent book instead of the many incoherent and mutually exclusive ones.He's be pellucid about His commands and so forth. No thing evil would appear and everything would cohere with reality.
To babble that why, He favors our free wills is so ignorati elenchi- irrelevant as, taking Yahweh as If, His presence did not overwhelm His Israelites. In reality, why would His pellucid word overwhelm us? Anyway, ti's not for Him to get us to please Him but to do for us what morality requires- that one-way street that He provides us with adequate safety as Fr. Meslier's the problem of Heaven requires; we have no duty to worship or please Him as free beings per Lamberth's argument from autonomy,
Yet, people do defend the idea that an omni-God has the right to let unrequited evil abound.
Yes, why sickness! What-self loathing for many.
Why would any rational person fall for that uncorroborated tissue of pervasive, purposeful perversity! It's purpose is to reduce people's self-esteem,only to raise it superciliously as they react to being born again as Tim Keller does in his " The Reason for God."
Yes, what rational person cannot find elsewhere inspiration than from this egregious putrid peace of p perversity?
To babble that why, He favors our free wills is so ignorati elenchi- irrelevant as, taking Yahweh as If, His presence did not overwhelm His Israelites. In reality, why would His pellucid word overwhelm us? Anyway, ti's not for Him to get us to please Him but to do for us what morality requires- that one-way street that He provides us with adequate safety as Fr. Meslier's the problem of Heaven requires; we have no duty to worship or please Him as free beings per Lamberth's argument from autonomy,
Yet, people do defend the idea that an omni-God has the right to let unrequited evil abound.
Yes, why sickness! What-self loathing for many.
Why would any rational person fall for that uncorroborated tissue of pervasive, purposeful perversity! It's purpose is to reduce people's self-esteem,only to raise it superciliously as they react to being born again as Tim Keller does in his " The Reason for God."
Yes, what rational person cannot find elsewhere inspiration than from this egregious putrid peace of p perversity?
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Monday, October 22, 2012
Monday, October 15, 2012
Saturday, October 13, 2012
Monday, October 8, 2012
Bull!
thr Biblr offers nothing of value that we cannot get elsewhere. I contradicts itself and -reality. Its ethics and morality are barbaric. Its Yahweh is a monster.
This blog will detail all that.
What is your position on that anthology , those anthologies the Tanakh and the Testameant?
This blog will detail all that.
What is your position on that anthology , those anthologies the Tanakh and the Testameant?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)